North
Red Deer Regional Water Supply Project Steering Committee
Recommendations
to Municipal Councils of the
Towns
of Blackfalds, Lacombe and Ponoka
September 17, 2001
1.
That
the long term water supply interests of the Towns of Blackfalds, Lacombe and
Ponoka are best served by the creation of a regional water supply system.
2.
That
the Towns continue to cooperate in further exploring the feasibility of a
regional system based on a supply of water from the Red Deer River.
Participants
and Customers (Section 3.0)
3.
That
the Towns would be the core participants in the system and through an
appropriate governance structure would be considered the “owners” of the
system.
4.
That
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) be invited to participate in the
system on behalf of the First Nations of Hobbema. Additional capacity and infrastructure in the system would be
constructed to supply the long term needs of the First Nations upon investment
of capital funds by INAC.
5.
That
rural municipalities and major industrial operations along the pipeline route
be invited to participate in the system for the supply of public water systems
in rural residential or commercial subdivision areas. Additional capacity and
infrastructure in the system would be constructed to supply the long term needs
of these rural municipalities and industries upon the execution of long term
purchase agreements.
6.
That
private customers, including rural subdivision co-op systems, be permitted to
purchase water in excess of consumption requirements of the committed
participants. Additional capacity equal
to 10% of the non-industrial consumption of the Towns would be constructed to
serve potential private customers.
7.
Customers
of the system accept water from the system with no guarantee of minimum
pressure or uninterrupted supply.
Customers shall be required to provide their own pumping and reservoir
capacity.
Water Source
Options (Section 6.0)
8.
That
the development of a separate treatment plant and river intake be the preferred
approach unless the long-term purchase of water from the City of Red Deer can
be arranged at price that is lower than the costs associated with the
construction and operation of separate facilities.
9.
That
should a separate treatment be considered, the river intake will be constructed
upstream from the discharge of the City of Red Deer Waste Water Treatment
Plant.
Pipeline
Alignment and Connections (Sections 7.0, 8.4)
10.
That
the Highway 2A (Red/Green) alignment be the preferred route as it provides the
greatest flexibility for selecting between water source options and has the
greatest potential to serve future private and rural municipal customers.
11.
That
the regional system provide one connection to the distribution systems of each
of the Towns.
Water
Treatment Process ( Section 11.0)
12.
That,
for the purposes of ensuring public safety and maintaining public confidence in
the drinking water supply and in anticipation of increasing contamination of the
Red Deer River raw water supply and rising government standards, the water
supplied to the regional system have higher levels of treatment than are
required by regulation and include additional measures to guard against
contamination by Giardia, Cryptosporidium, and other potential viruses and
pathogens.
13.
That
additional capital costs be accepted for more environmentally benign methods of
disinfection and for reduced energy consumption and emissions
14.
That,
should the regional system construct its own treatment facility, fluoride be
added to the treated water.
Ownership
and Governance (Section 19.0)
15.
That
ownership and operation of the regional system by the Towns is preferred unless
ownership and/or operation by private or public/private partnership interests
can be proven to less expensive in the long term.
16.
That
private interests be invited to submit proposals for the construction and/or
operation of a regional system.
17.
That,
should the Towns own and operate a regional system, which includes its own water
treatement plant, a regional commission be the preferred vehicle for ownership
and governance. Otherwise joint
municipal ownership would be appropriate.
Capital Cost
Sharing (Section 17.0)
18.
That
the Towns share the net capital costs of a system of sufficient to supply the
long-term domestic and industrial water needs of the Towns plus any capacity
added for sale to other interests under recommendation 5.2.4. on the basis of
the identified equal-sharing model with proportions based on the nominated consumption
requirements of the Towns.
“Net capital costs” is defined as gross capital costs less any grant or other
external funding jointly accessed by the Towns.
“Nominated” is defined as a commitment to purchase a given volume of water at
the 20 year time horizon. Nominated
volumes may be “sold” to others.
19.
That
INAC, if it chooses to participate, be required to fund the incremental capital
costs of adding sufficient intake, treatment, pumping and pipeline capacity and
additional infrastructure required to serve the long-term consumption of the
First Nations.
20.
That
any rural municipalities, major industrial customers and other private
customers be required to fund the capital costs of infrastructure required to
connect, store and pump purchased water.
Operating
Costs
21.
Water
purchased by the Towns be charged on a utility rate model basis taking into
consideration both actual consumption and respective nominated volumes.
22.
INAC,
rural municipalities, industrial users and other private customers would be
charged on a utility rate model basis reflective of the initial capital
contributions made.
Implementation
23.
That
the target date for the commencement of operations of a regional supply system
be May 1, 2005.
24.
That
the Municipal Councils of the Towns and INAC provide confirmation of intent to
participate in a regional system by June 1, 2002.
25.
That
rural municipalities or major industrial users, wishing to guarantee a supply
of water, commit to participate in a regional system by September 1, 2003.